Brexit outrage: EU punishment plot leaves UK facing economic ‘FAMINE’ over deal

Northern Ireland Protocol Bill slammed by EU ambassador

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info

The House of Lords Northern Ireland committee paints a grim picture of the impact caused by the Northern Ireland Protocol imposed on the UK during Brexit withdrawal negotiations in 2019. It finds that while those firms who do trade between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland have benefited from the new trading relationship, those who export goods from Britain across the Irish Sea are suffering.

Unionists have accused Brussels of putting the future of the UK at risk with an unnecessarily strict implementation of rules.

Under the Protocol, goods crossing from Britain to the province must be subjected to customs checks.

There are fears among some Brexiteers that the approach being adopted by the EU is aimed at punishing the UK for quitting the bloc.

Lord Jay of Ewelme, who chairs the Northern Ireland committee, warned that unless urgent changes were made, the future of many businesses is at risk.

He said: “The committee’s engagement with businesses trading in and with Northern Ireland has demonstrated that, while much uncertainty remains, the economic impact of the protocol is gradually becoming clearer.

“The situation was described to us as ‘feast or famine’, whereby businesses able to take advantage of the protocol benefit, while those dependent on trade with Great Britain lose out.”

Peers on the committee are desperately urging the UK and EU to agree on a compromise deal to avoid devastating firms.

They warn that the Protocol has had a disproportionately negative impact on small and medium-size enterprises.

LIVE UPDATES: Brexit LIVE: ‘Childish’ EU shuts down official relations with UK

The parliamentary report blames ramped-up bureaucracy and a slow down in delivery times caused by the EU customs checks for the current mess.

Ministers have said they remain open to holding further discussions with the European Commission about easing frictions caused by the Protocol.

However, after months of impasse in talks, the Government has vowed to take unilateral action to provide a safety net.

Legislation is currently making its way through Parliament that would give ministers permission to unilaterally suspend rules required under the Protocol and help improve the flow of trade between Britain and Northern Ireland.

Who won Tory leadership debate – Rishi Sunak or Liz Truss? VOTE HERE [POLL]
Truss wins TV debate ‘by a country mile’ as viewers dub Rishi ‘rude’ [REACTION]
‘Liz Truss is no Boris. If she’s the best we’ve got GOD HELP US ALL!’ [OPINION]

The Northern Ireland Protocol was agreed as part of the withdrawal agreement from the EU to avoid a hard border in Ireland post-Brexit.

It allows Northern Ireland to remain within the EU’s single market for goods but it has faced criticism because a border was effectively created between Great Britain and Northern Ireland down the Irish Sea.

The border has led to delays, supermarket shortages and increased costs for businesses in Northern Ireland.

The UK has been locked in talks with the EU over the protocol since October 2021.

Foreign Secretary Liz Truss said the protocol is “currently undermining the Belfast (Good Friday) Agreement, the foundation of peace and political stability.”

She added: “Aside from its many practical problems, it has created a growing sense that the rights and aspirations of some parts of the community are being undermined.

“Ideally, we would fix these problems through negotiation, but the EU has ruled out changing the text of the protocol.

“Northern Ireland has been without a fully functioning executive since February because of the protocol, at the time of a cost of living crisis and many other challenges.

“Therefore it is the duty of this government, as co-signatory and co-guarantor of the agreement, but also as the sovereign government in Northern Ireland, to act.”

Source: Read Full Article